|
|
V Announcements
|
|
|
|
COURT PROCEEDINGS
|
|
|
|
Court of Justice
|
|
|
2016/C 048/2
|
Case C-595/13: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 December 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Netherlands) — Staatssecretaris van Financiën v Fiscale Eenheid X NV cs (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Sixth VAT Directive — Exemptions — Article 13B(d)(6) — Special investment funds — Meaning — Investments in immovable property — Management of special investment funds — Meaning — Actual management of a property)
|
2
|
|
2016/C 048/3
|
Case C-350/14: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 10 December 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale civile di Trieste — Italy) — Florin Lazar v Allianz SpA (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation No 864/2007 — Article 4(1) — Concepts of ‘country in which the damage occurs’, ‘damage’ and ‘indirect consequences of the tort or delict’ — Damage sustained personally by a family member of a person who died as a result of a road traffic accident — Applicable law)
|
3
|
|
2016/C 048/4
|
Case C-427/14: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 10 December 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākās tiesas, Latvia) — Valsts ieņēmumu dienests v ‘Veloserviss’ SIA (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Community Customs Code — Post-clearance examination of declarations — Principle of the protection of legitimate expectations — National rules placing restrictions on re-examination of the results of a post-clearance examination — Powers — Decision on the first post-clearance examination — Incorrect or incomplete information not known on the date of the decision)
|
3
|
|
2016/C 048/5
|
Case C-552/14 P: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 December 2015 — Canon Europa NV v European Commission (Appeal — Customs Union and Common Customs Tariff — Regulation (EU) No 861/2010 — Actions for annulment — Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU — Regulatory act not entailing implementing measures — Release of goods and communication of the amount of the duties — Use of simplified procedures or data-processing techniques)
|
4
|
|
2016/C 048/6
|
Case C-553/14 P: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 December 2015 — Kyocera Mita Europe BV v European Commission (Appeal — Customs Union and Common Customs Tariff — Regulation (EU) No 861/2010 — Actions for annulment — Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU — Regulatory act not entailing implementing measures — Release of goods and communication of the amount of the duties — Use of simplified procedures or data-processing techniques)
|
4
|
|
2016/C 048/7
|
Case C-594/14: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 December 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — Simona Kornhaas v Thomas Dithmar, acting as liquidator of the assets of Kornhaas Montage und Dienstleistung Ltd (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Insolvency proceedings — Regulation (EC) No 1346/2000 — Article 4(1) — Determination of the applicable law — Legislation of a Member State laying down the obligation for a managing director of a company to reimburse that company for the payments made after it had become insolvent — Application of that legislation to a company established in another Member State — Articles 49 TFEU and 54 TFEU — Restriction on the freedom of establishment — None)
|
5
|
|
2016/C 048/8
|
Case C-603/14 P: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 10 December 2015 — El Corte Inglés, SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (Appeal — Community trade mark — Application for the word mark The English Cut — Opposition by the proprietor of the national and Community word and figurative marks including the word elements ‘El Corte Inglés’ — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 8(1)(b) — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(5) — Risk that the relevant public will make a connection with a trade mark which has a reputation — Degree of similarity required)
|
6
|
|
2016/C 048/9
|
Case C-183/15: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 December 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — TSI GmbH v Hauptzollamt Aachen (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common Customs Tariff — Tariff classification — Combined Nomenclature — Sub-heading 9027 10 10 — Ultraviolet aerodynamic particle sizer spectrometers — Handheld particle counters)
|
6
|
|
2016/C 048/10
|
Case C-190/15 P: Appeal brought on 24 April 2015 by Fetim BV against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 11 February 2015 in Case T-395/12: Fetim v OHIM
|
7
|
|
2016/C 048/11
|
Case C-206/15 P: Appeal brought on 14 April 2015 by Sun Mark Ltd and Bulldog Energy Drink Ltd against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 5 February 2015 in Case T-78/13: Red Bull v OHIM
|
7
|
|
2016/C 048/12
|
Case C-422/15 P: Appeal brought on 30 July 2015 by Fernando Brás Messias against the order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) delivered on 4 June 2015 in Case T-192/15 Fernando Brás Messias v Portuguese Republic
|
8
|
|
2016/C 048/13
|
Case C-425/15: Action brought on 31 July 2015 — Udo Voigt v President of the European Parliament, European Parliament
|
8
|
|
2016/C 048/14
|
Case C-533/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 13 October 2015 — Feliks Frisman v Finnair Oyj
|
8
|
|
2016/C 048/15
|
Case C-541/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Wuppertal (Germany) lodged on 16 October 2015 — Mircea Florian Freitag
|
9
|
|
2016/C 048/16
|
Case C-551/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Općinski sud u Puli-Pola (Croatia) lodged on 23 October 2015 — Pula Parking d.o.o. v Sven Kalus Tederahn
|
9
|
|
2016/C 048/17
|
Case C-561/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Hannover (Germany) lodged on 2 November 2015 — Georg Rolof, Markus Heimann v TUIfly GmbH
|
10
|
|
2016/C 048/18
|
Case C-574/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Varese (Italy) lodged on 9 November 2015 — Criminal proceedings against Mauro Scialdone
|
10
|
|
2016/C 048/19
|
Case C-590/15 P: Appeal brought on 13 November 2015 by Alain Laurent Brouillard against the judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) delivered on 14 September 2015 in Case T-420/13, Brouillard v Court of Justice
|
11
|
|
2016/C 048/20
|
Case C-600/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) lodged on 16 November 2015 — Staatssecretaris van Financiën; Other party: Lemnis Lighting BV
|
13
|
|
2016/C 048/21
|
Case C-610/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) lodged on 18 November 2015 — Stichting Brein, Other parties: Ziggo BV and XS4ALL Internet BV
|
13
|
|
2016/C 048/22
|
Case C-612/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 18 November 2015 — Criminal proceedings against Kolev and Others
|
14
|
|
2016/C 048/23
|
Case C-613/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia No 5 de Alcobendas (Spain) lodged on 20 November 2015 — Ibercaja Banco S.A.U. v José Cortés González
|
17
|
|
2016/C 048/24
|
Case C-620/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France) lodged on 23 November 2015 — A-Rosa Flussschiff GmbH v Union de recouvrement des cotisations de sécurité sociale et d’allocations familiales d’Alsace (URSSAF), Sozialversicherunganstalt des Kantons Graubünden (Social Insurance Institution for the Canton of Graubünden)
|
18
|
|
2016/C 048/25
|
Case C-621/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France) lodged on 23 November 2015 –W and Others v Sanofi Pasteur MSD SNC, Caisse primaire d’assurance maladie des Hauts-de-Seine, Caisse Carpimko
|
18
|
|
2016/C 048/26
|
Case C-624/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vilniaus apygardos administracinis teismas (Lithuania) lodged on 23 November 2015 — Litdana UAB v Valstybinė mokesčių inspekcija prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos
|
19
|
|
2016/C 048/27
|
Case C-637/15 P: Appeal brought on 01 December 2015 by VSM Geneesmiddelen BV against the order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 16 September 2015 in Case T-578/14: VSM Geneesmiddelen BV v European Commission
|
20
|
|
2016/C 048/28
|
Case C-646/15: Reference for a preliminary ruling from First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) (United Kingdom) made on 3 December 2015 — Trustees of the P Panayi Accumulation & Maintenance Settlements v Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs
|
22
|
|
2016/C 048/29
|
Case C-649/15 P: Appeal brought on 3 December 2015 by TV2/Danmark A/S against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 24 September 2015 in Case T-674/11 TV2/Danmark A/S v European Commission
|
23
|
|
2016/C 048/30
|
Case C-650/15 P: Appeal brought on 4 December 2015 by Polyelectrolyte Producers Group GEIE (PPG), SNF SAS against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 25/09/2015 in Case T-268/10 RENV: Polyelectrolyte Producers Group GEIE (PPG), SNF SAS v European Chemicals Agency (ECHA)
|
25
|
|
2016/C 048/31
|
Case C-654/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta domstolen (Sweden) lodged on 7 December 2015 — Länsförsäkringar AB v A/S Matek
|
26
|
|
2016/C 048/32
|
Case C-656/15 P: Appeal brought on 7 December 2015 by European Commission against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 24 September 2015 in Case T-674/11 TV2/Danmark A/S v European Commission
|
27
|
|
|
General Court
|
|
|
2016/C 048/33
|
Case T-9/11: Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2015 — Air Canada v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European airfreight market — Agreements and concerted practices in respect of several elements of the pricing of airfreight services (imposition of fuel and security surcharges, refusal to pay commission on surcharges) — Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and Switzerland on Air Transport — Obligation to state reasons)
|
29
|
|
2016/C 048/34
|
Case T-28/11: Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2015 — Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European airfreight market — Agreements and concerted practices in respect of several elements of the pricing of airfreight services (imposition of fuel and security surcharges, refusal to pay commission on surcharges) — Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and Switzerland on Air Transport — Obligation to state reasons)
|
30
|
|
2016/C 048/35
|
Case T-36/11: Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2015 — Japan Airlines v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European airfreight market — Agreements and concerted practices in respect of several elements of the pricing of airfreight services (imposition of fuel and security surcharges, refusal to pay commission on surcharges) — Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and Switzerland on Air Transport — Obligation to state reasons)
|
31
|
|
2016/C 048/36
|
Case T-38/11: Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2015 — Cathay Pacific Airways v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European airfreight market — Agreements and concerted practices in respect of several elements of the pricing of airfreight services (imposition of fuel and security surcharges, refusal to pay commission on surcharges) — Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and Switzerland on Air Transport — Obligation to state reasons)
|
32
|
|
2016/C 048/37
|
Case T-39/11: Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2015 — Cargolux Airlines v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European airfreight market — Agreements and concerted practices in respect of several elements of the pricing of airfreight services (imposition of fuel and security surcharges, refusal to pay commission on surcharges) — Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and Switzerland on Air Transport — Obligation to state reasons)
|
33
|
|
2016/C 048/38
|
Case T-40/11: Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2015 — Latam Airlines Group and Lan Cargo v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European airfreight market — Agreements and concerted practices in respect of several elements of the pricing of airfreight services (imposition of fuel and security surcharges, refusal to pay commission on surcharges) — Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and Switzerland on Air Transport — Obligation to state reasons)
|
34
|
|
2016/C 048/39
|
Case T-43/11: Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2015 — Singapore Airlines and Singapore Airlines Cargo v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European airfreight market — Agreements and concerted practices in respect of several elements of the pricing of airfreight services (imposition of fuel and security surcharges, refusal to pay commission on surcharges) — Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and Switzerland on Air Transport — Obligation to state reasons)
|
35
|
|
2016/C 048/40
|
Case T-46/11: Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2015 — Deutsche Lufthansa and Others v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European airfreight market — Agreements and concerted practices in respect of several elements of the pricing of airfreight services (imposition of fuel and security surcharges, refusal to pay commission on surcharges) — Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and Switzerland on Air Transport — Obligation to state reasons)
|
36
|
|
2016/C 048/41
|
Case T-48/11: Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2015 — British Airways v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European airfreight market — Agreements and concerted practices in respect of several elements of the pricing of airfreight services (imposition of fuel and security surcharges, refusal to pay commission on surcharges) — Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and Switzerland on Air Transport — Obligation to state reasons)
|
37
|
|
2016/C 048/42
|
Case T-56/11: Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2015 — SAS Cargo Group and Others v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European airfreight market — Agreements and concerted practices in respect of several elements of the pricing of airfreight services (imposition of fuel and security surcharges, refusal to pay commission on surcharges) — Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and Switzerland on Air Transport — Obligation to state reasons)
|
38
|
|
2016/C 048/43
|
Case T-62/11: Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2015 — Air France-KLM v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European airfreight market — Agreements and concerted practices in respect of several elements of the pricing of airfreight services (imposition of fuel and security surcharges, refusal to pay commission on surcharges) — Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and Switzerland on Air Transport — Obligation to state reasons)
|
39
|
|
2016/C 048/44
|
Case T-63/11: Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2015 — Air France v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European airfreight market — Agreements and concerted practices in respect of several elements of the pricing of airfreight services (imposition of fuel and security surcharges, refusal to pay commission on surcharges) — Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and Switzerland on Air Transport — Obligation to state reasons)
|
40
|
|
2016/C 048/45
|
Case T-67/11: Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2015 — Martinair Holland v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European airfreight market — Agreements and concerted practices in respect of several elements of the pricing of airfreight services (imposition of fuel and security surcharges, refusal to pay commission on surcharges) — Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and Switzerland on Air Transport — Obligation to state reasons)
|
41
|
|
2016/C 048/46
|
Case T-73/12: Judgment of the General Court of 18 November 2015 — Einhell Germany and Others v Commission (Dumping — Imports of certain compressors originating in China — Partial refusal to refund the anti-dumping duties paid — Determination of the export price — Deduction of anti-dumping duties — Adjustment of the temporal effects of an annulment)
|
41
|
|
2016/C 048/47
|
Case T-75/12: Judgment of the General Court of 18 November 2015 — Nu Air Polska v Commission (Dumping — Imports of certain compressors originating in China — Partial refusal to refund the anti-dumping duties paid — Determination of the export price — Deduction of anti-dumping duties — Adjustment of the temporal effects of an annulment)
|
42
|
|
2016/C 048/48
|
Case T-108/13: Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2015 — VTZ and Others v Council (Dumping — Imports of certain seamless pipes and tubes of iron or steel originating in Russia — Definitive anti-dumping duty — Product concerned)
|
43
|
|
2016/C 048/49
|
Case T-241/13: Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2015 — Greece v Commission (EAGGF — Guarantee Section — EAGF and EAFRD — Expenditure excluded from the financing — Beef and beef products — Sheepmeat and goatmeat — Tobacco — Article 69 of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 — Article 31(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 — Article 23(1) of Regulation (EC) No 796/2004)
|
44
|
|
2016/C 048/50
|
Joined Cases T-381/13 and T-382/13: Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2015 — Perfetti Van Melle v OHIM (DAISY and MARGARITAS) (Community trade mark — Application for Community word marks DAISY and MARGARITAS — Absolute grounds for refusal — Partial refusal to register — No distinctive character — Distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
|
45
|
|
2016/C 048/51
|
Case T-491/13: Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2015 — Perfetti Van Melle Benelux v OHIM — Intercontinental Great Brands (TRIDENT PURE) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark TRIDENT PURE — Earlier Community, national, international and Benelux figurative and word marks PURE WHITE, mentos PURE FRESH PURE BREATH, PURE, PURE FRESH, mentos PURE FRESH and mentos PURE WHITE — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
|
46
|
|
2016/C 048/52
|
Case T-138/14: Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2015 — Chart v EEAS (Non-contractual liability — Local member of staff assigned to the EU delegation in Egypt — Expiry of contract — Failure by the EU delegation to issue a termination of service certificate in respect of the official to the social security services of the Egyptian administration and to subsequently regularise the latter’s situation in that regard — Limitation — Continuing damage — Partial inadmissibility — Principle of good administration — Reasonable period of time — Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights — Sufficiently serious infringement of a legal rule conferring rights on individuals — Quantifiable damage — Causal link)
|
46
|
|
2016/C 048/53
|
Case T-356/14: Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2015 — CareAbout v OHIM — Florido Rodríguez (Kerashot) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark Kerashot — Earlier national figurative mark K KERASOL — Relative grounds for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Partial refusal of registration by the Board of Appeal)
|
47
|
|
2016/C 048/54
|
Case T-521/14: Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2015 — Sweden v Commission (Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 — Biocidal products — Action for failure to act — Specification of the scientific criteria for the determination of endocrine-disrupting properties — Failure by the Commission to adopt delegated acts — Duty to act)
|
48
|
|
2016/C 048/55
|
Case T-63/15: Judgment of the General Court of 15 December 2015 — Shoe Branding Europe v OHIM (two parallel stripes on the long sleeves of a shirt) (Community trade mark — Application for a Community trade mark consisting of two parallel stripes on the long sleeves of a shirt — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
|
49
|
|
2016/C 048/56
|
Case T-64/15: Judgment of the General Court of 15 December 2015 — Shoe Branding Europe v OHIM (two parallel stripes on pants) (Community trade mark — Application for a Community trade mark consisting of two parallel stripes on pants — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
|
49
|
|
2016/C 048/57
|
Case T-128/15: Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2015 — Rotkäppchen-Mumm Sektkellereien v OHIM — Ruiz Moncayo (RED RIDING HOOD) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community word mark RED RIDING HOOD — Earlier national and international word marks ROTKÄPPCHEN — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — No similarity between the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
|
50
|
|
2016/C 048/58
|
Case T-584/15 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 7 December 2015 — POA v Commission (Application for interim measures — Publication of an application for registration of a protected designation of origin — ‘Halloumi’ or ‘Hellim’ — Application for suspension of operation of a measure — No urgency)
|
51
|
|
2016/C 048/59
|
Case T-671/15 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 4 December 2015 — E-Control v ACER (Application for interim measures — Opinion on the compliance of national regulatory authorities’ decisions approving the methods of cross-border electricity transmission capacity — Application for suspension of operation of a measure — Infringement of the procedural requirements — Inadmissibility)
|
51
|
|
2016/C 048/60
|
Case T-603/15: Action brought on 23 October 2015 –Frank v Commission
|
52
|
|
2016/C 048/61
|
Case T-639/15: Action brought on 13 November 2015 — Psara v Parliament
|
53
|
|
2016/C 048/62
|
Case T-640/15: Action brought on 13 November 2015 — Kristan v Parliament
|
54
|
|
2016/C 048/63
|
Case T-641/15: Action brought on 13 November 2015 — Malle v Parliament
|
55
|
|
2016/C 048/64
|
Case T-642/15: Action brought on 13 November 2015 — Cieśla v Parliament
|
56
|
|
2016/C 048/65
|
Case T-643/15: Action brought on 13 November 2015 — Dahllof v Parliament
|
57
|
|
2016/C 048/66
|
Case T-644/15: Action brought on 13 November 2015 — Reuter v Parliament
|
58
|
|
2016/C 048/67
|
Case T-645/15: Action brought on 13/11/2015 — České centrum pro investigativní žurnalistiku v Parliament
|
59
|
|
2016/C 048/68
|
Case T-646/15: Action brought on 13 November 2015 — Karanikas v Parliament
|
60
|
|
2016/C 048/69
|
Case T-647/15: Action brought on 13 November 2015 — Boros v Parliament
|
61
|
|
2016/C 048/70
|
Case T-648/15: Action brought on 13 November 2015 — Baltijas pētnieciskās žurnālistikas centrs Re:Baltica v Parliament
|
62
|
|
2016/C 048/71
|
Case T-649/15: Action brought on 13 November 2015 — Toth v Parliament
|
63
|
|
2016/C 048/72
|
Case T-650/15: Action brought on 13 November 2015 — Knus-Galán v Parliament
|
64
|
|
2016/C 048/73
|
Case T-651/15: Action brought on 13 November 2015 — Tchobanov v Parliament
|
65
|
|
2016/C 048/74
|
Case T-653/15: Action brought on 13 November 2015 — Mulvad v Parliament
|
66
|
|
2016/C 048/75
|
Case T-654/15: Action brought on 13 November 2015 — České centrum pro investigativní žurnalistiku v Parliament
|
67
|
|
2016/C 048/76
|
Case T-655/15: Action brought on 13 November 2015 — van der Parre v Parliament
|
68
|
|
2016/C 048/77
|
Case T-656/15: Action brought on 13 November 2015 — Baggi v Parliament
|
69
|
|
2016/C 048/78
|
Case T-657/15: Action brought on 13 November 2015 — Boros v Parliament
|
70
|
|
2016/C 048/79
|
Case T-658/15: Action brought on 13 November 2015 — García Rey v Parliament
|
71
|
|
2016/C 048/80
|
Case T-659/15: Action brought on 13 November 2015 — Hunter v Parliament
|
72
|
|
2016/C 048/81
|
Case T-660/15: Action brought on 13 November 2015 — Clerix v Parliament
|
73
|
|
2016/C 048/82
|
Case T-661/15: Action brought on 13 November 2015 — Araujo v Parliament
|
74
|
|
2016/C 048/83
|
Case T-662/15: Action brought on 13 November 2015 — Delić v Parliament
|
75
|
|
2016/C 048/84
|
Case T-663/15: Action brought on 13 November 2015 — Baltijas pētnieciskās žurnālistikas centrs Re:Baltica v Parliament
|
76
|
|
2016/C 048/85
|
Case T-664/15: Action brought on 13 November 2015 — Borg v Parliament
|
77
|
|
2016/C 048/86
|
Case T-665/15: Action brought on 13 November 2015 — Baltijas pētnieciskās žurnālistikas centrs Re:Baltica v Parliament
|
78
|
|
2016/C 048/87
|
Case T-666/15: Action brought on 13 November 2015 — Bačelić v Parliament
|
79
|
|
2016/C 048/88
|
Case T-669/15: Action brought on 09 October 2015 — Lysoform Dr. Hans Rosemann e.a. v ECHA
|
80
|
|
2016/C 048/89
|
Case T-683/15: Action brought on 26 November 2015 — Freistaat Bayern v Commission
|
81
|
|
2016/C 048/90
|
Case T-686/15: Action brought on 29 November 2015 — Marcas Costa Brava v OHIM — Excellent Brands JMI (Cremcaffé by Julius Meinl)
|
82
|
|
2016/C 048/91
|
Case T-687/15: Action brought on 29 November 2015 — Marcas Costa Brava/OHMI — Excellent Brands JMI (Cremcaffé by Julius Meinl)
|
83
|
|
2016/C 048/92
|
Case T-689/15: Action brought on 29 November 2015 — Marcas Costa Brava v OHIM — Excellent Brands JMI (Cremcaffé by Julius Meinl)
|
84
|
|
2016/C 048/93
|
Case T-690/15: Action brought on 29 November 2015 — Marcas Costa Brava v OHIM — Excellent Brands JMI (Cremcaffé)
|
85
|
|
2016/C 048/94
|
Case T-691/15: Action brought on 29 November 2015 — Marcas Costa Brava v OHIM — Excellent Brands JMI (Cremcaffé by Julius Meinl)
|
86
|
|
2016/C 048/95
|
Case T-703/15: Action brought on 30 November 2015 — Groupe Go Sport v OHIM — Design Go (GO SPORT)
|
86
|
|
2016/C 048/96
|
Case T-101/13: Order of the General Court of 30 November 2015 — Aer Lingus v Commission
|
87
|
|
|
European Union Civil Service Tribunal
|
|
|
2016/C 048/97
|
Case F-45/11: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Single Judge) of 18 December 2015 — De Nicola v EIB (Civil Service — EIB staff — Appraisal — 2009 staff report — Unlawfulness of the decision of the Adjudication Panel — Refusal of promotion — No need to adjudicate)
|
88
|
|
2016/C 048/98
|
Case F-37/12: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Single Judge) of 18 December 2015 — De Nicola v EIB (Civil Service — EIB staff — Psychological harassment — Investigation procedure — Report of the Investigation Panel — Incorrect definition of psychological harassment — Decision of the President of the EIB to take no action on a complaint — Annulment — Action for compensation)
|
88
|
|
2016/C 048/99
|
Case F-82/12: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Single Judge) of 18 December 2015 — De Nicola v EIB (Civil Service — EIB staff — Appraisal — New 2007 staff report — Unlawfulness of the decision of the Adjudication Panel — Refusal of promotion — No need to adjudicate)
|
89
|
|
2016/C 048/100
|
Case F-55/13: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Single Judge) of 18 December 2015 — De Nicola v EIB (Civil Service — EIB staff — Appraisal — 2011 staff report — Unlawfulness of the decision of the Adjudication Panel — No need to adjudicate)
|
90
|
|
2016/C 048/101
|
Case F-104/13: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Single Judge) of 18 December 2015 — De Nicola v EIB (Civil Service — EIB staff — Psychological harassment — Investigation procedure — Report of the Investigation Panel — Incorrect definition of psychological harassment — Decision of the President of the EIB to take no action on a complaint — Annulment — Action for compensation)
|
90
|
|
2016/C 048/102
|
Case F-9/14: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Single Judge) of 18 December 2015 — De Nicola v EIB (Civil Service — EIB staff — Appraisal — 2012 staff report — Unlawfulness of the decision of the Adjudication Panel — Refusal of promotion — No need to adjudicate)
|
91
|
|
2016/C 048/103
|
Case F-94/14: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 17 December 2015 — Bowles v ECB (Civil service — ECB staff — Members of the Staff Committee — Remuneration — Salary — Additional increase in salary — Eligibility)
|
92
|
|
2016/C 048/104
|
Case F-95/14: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 17 December 2015 — Seigneur v ECB (Civil service — ECB staff — Members of the Staff Committee — Remuneration — Salary — Additional increase in salary — Eligibility)
|
92
|
|
2016/C 048/105
|
Joined cases F-101/14, F-102/14 and F-103/14: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 15 December 2015 — Clarke, Dickmanns and Papathanasiou v OHIM (Civil service — Temporary staff — OHIM staff — Fixed-term contract including a termination clause — Clause terminating a contract if the agent is not included on the reserve list of a competition — Date of effect of the termination clause — OHIM/AD/01/13 and OHIM/AST/02/13 open competitions)
|
93
|
|
2016/C 048/106
|
Case F-134/14: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Single Judge) of 17 December 2015 — T v Commission (Civil service — Social security — Occupational disease — Article 73 of the Staff Regulations — Application for recognition of the occupational origin of a disease — Causation — Claim for damages for the non-material harm suffered as a result of the delay taken by the institution to acknowledge the occupational origin of the sickness — Obligation to adjudicate within a reasonable time — Non-material damage)
|
94
|
|
2016/C 048/107
|
Case F-135/14: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 16 December 2015 — DE v EMA (Civil service — EMA staff — Placement on ‘non-active status’ — Act adversely affecting an official or staff member — Right to be heard — Infringement)
|
95
|
|
2016/C 048/108
|
Case F-141/14: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 15 December 2015 — Guittet v Commission (Civil service — Former official — Social security — Payment of medical expenses — Management of the medical file by the Commission — Principle of sound administration and the duty to have regard for the welfare of officials — Non-contractual liability of the European Union)
|
95
|
|
2016/C 048/109
|
Case F-17/15: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Single Chamber) of 10 December 2015 — Jäger-Waldau v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Appraisal — Appraisal report — Request for amendment — Refusal)
|
96
|
|
2016/C 048/110
|
Case F-34/15: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 16 December 2015 — De Loecker v EEAS (Civil service — EEAS staff — Temporary staff — Psychological harassment — Articles 12a and 24b of the Staff Regulations — Request for assistance — Rejection — Request to open an administrative investigation — Right to be heard — Infringement)
|
96
|
|
2016/C 048/111
|
Case F-88/15: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 15 December 2015 — Bonazzi v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Promotion exercise 2014 — General implementing provisions for Article 45 of the Staff Regulations — List of officials proposed for promotion by the Directorates-General and the services — Omission of the applicant’s name — Whether the list of officials proposed for promotion may be challenged before the Joint Promotion Committee — Failure to define a position by the Joint Promotion Committee — Consideration of comparative merits made by the appointing authority alone)
|
97
|
|
2016/C 048/112
|
Case F-128/11: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Single Judge) of 18 December 2015 — De Nicola v EIB (Civil Service — EIB staff — Appraisal — 2010 staff report — Contested — Internal procedures — Conditions — Withdrawal — Action — Lack of locus standi — Reasonable time — Failure to comply — Manifestly inadmissible)
|
98
|
|
2016/C 048/113
|
Case F-76/14: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (2nd Chamber) of 17 December 2015 — López Cabeza v Commission (Civil Service — Open competition — Competition notice EPSO/AD/248/13 — Non-inclusion on the reserve list — Insufficient mark in the assessment centre tests — Action for annulment — Breach of the competition notice — Illegality of a test)
|
98
|
|
2016/C 048/114
|
Case F-118/14: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 16 December 2015 — Bärwinkel v Council (Civil service — Officials — Reform of the Staff Regulations — Transitional rules concerning assignment to types of posts — Article 30(2) of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations — Concept of measure adversely affecting a person — Decision recognising that certain officials hold special responsibilities — Non-inclusion of the applicant's name in the first list of 34 officials recognised as holding special responsibilities — Requirements referring to the pre-litigation procedure — No complaint within the meaning of Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations — Article 81 of the Rules of Procedure)
|
99
|
|
2016/C 048/115
|
Case F-136/14: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (1st Chamber) of 7 December 2015 — Probst v Commission (Civil service — Remuneration — Expatriation allowance — Article 4 of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations — Former parliamentary assistant — Commission’s decision to grant the expatriation allowance to former parliamentary assistants as of the date of publication of the information given to staff — Judgments annulling a measure — Substantial new facts — Limited temporal effect — Res judicata — Administrative decisions which have become final — Equal treatment)
|
100
|
|
2016/C 048/116
|
Case F-24/15: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 17 December 2015 — Di Marzio v Council (Civil service — Contractual agent — Function group I — Reclassification of a contract into a contract as a member of the temporary staff for an indefinite term at Grade AST 3, AST 4 or AST 5 or into a contract as a member of the contract staff for an indefinite term in function group III — Articles 2, 3a, 3b, 80 and 88 of the Conditions of Employment of other servants — Obligation to state reasons — Manifest error of assessment — Principle of sound administration — Duty of care — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law — Article 81 of the Rules of Procedure)
|
100
|
|
2016/C 048/117
|
Case F-45/15: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (1st Chamber) of 9 December 2015 — Van der Veen v Europol (Civil Service — Europol staff — Member of the temporary staff — Decision 2009/371/JHA — Europol’s refusal to sign a contract for an indefinite period — Article 81 of the Rules of Procedure — Action manifestly inadmissible)
|
101
|
|
2016/C 048/118
|
Case F-144/15: Action brought on 23 November 2015 — ZZ v EASA
|
102
|
|
2016/C 048/119
|
Case F-30/15: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 17 December 2015 — Diamantopoulos v EEAS
|
102
|
|
2016/C 048/120
|
Case F-58/15: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 17 December 2015 — FW v Commission
|
102
|
|
2016/C 048/121
|
Case F-129/15: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 17 December 2015 — Morin v Commission
|
102
|
