5.8.2019 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 263/50 |
Action brought on 6 June 2019 — UE v Commission
(Case T-338/19)
(2019/C 263/58)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: UE (represented by: S. Rodrigues and A. Champetier, avocats)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
— |
annul the Commission decision dated 1 August 2018 rejecting the applicant’s request to recognise an occupational disease; |
— |
if needed, annul the Commission decision dated 5 March 2019 rejecting the applicant’s complaint dated 5 November 2018; |
— |
order the reimbursement of the applicant’s incurred costs. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.
1. |
First plea in law, alleging a manifest error of interpretation of the reasonableness of the period of time in which the occupational disease request has been lodged. |
2. |
Second plea in law, alleging the misuse of power. |
3. |
Third plea in law, alleging the breach of the rights of defence and of the duty to state reasons. |