|
|
V Announcements
|
|
|
|
COURT PROCEEDINGS
|
|
|
|
Court of Justice
|
|
|
2012/C 138/02
|
Case C-59/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany), lodged on 6 February 2012 — BKK Mobil Oil, a body governed by public law v Zentrale zur Bekämpfung unlauteren Wettbewerbs e.V.
|
2
|
|
2012/C 138/03
|
Case C-82/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Cataluña (Spain) lodged on 16 February 2012 — Transportes Jordi Besora, S.L. v Tribunal Económico Administrativo Regional de Cataluña (TEARC) and Generalitat de Catalunya
|
2
|
|
2012/C 138/04
|
Case C-86/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour administrative (Luxembourg) lodged on 20 February 2012 — Adzo Domenyo Alopka, Jarel Mondoulou, Eja Mondoulou v Ministre du Travail, de l’Emploi et de l’Immigration
|
3
|
|
2012/C 138/05
|
Case C-87/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour administrative (Luxembourg) lodged on 20 February 2012 — Kreshnik Ymerag, Kasim Ymeraga, Afijete Ymeraga-Tafarshiku, Kushtrim Ymeraga, Labinot Ymeraga v Minister for Labour, Employment and Immigration
|
3
|
|
2012/C 138/06
|
Case C-96/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal da Relação de Guimarães (Portugal) lodged on 22 February 2012 — Domingos Freitas and Maria Adília Monteiro Pinto v Companhia de Seguros Allianz Portugal SA
|
4
|
|
2012/C 138/07
|
Case C-99/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de première instance de Bruxelles (Belgium) lodged on 24 February 2012 — Eurofit SA v Bureau d’intervention et de restitution belge (BIRB)
|
4
|
|
2012/C 138/08
|
Case C-104/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany), lodged on 29 February 2012 — Finanzamt Köln-Nord v Wolfram Becker
|
5
|
|
2012/C 138/09
|
Case C-114/12: Action brought on 1 March 2012 — European Commission v Council of the European Union
|
5
|
|
2012/C 138/10
|
Case C-115/12 P: Appeal brought on 5 March 2012 by the French Republic against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 16 December 2011 in Case T-488/10 France v Commission
|
6
|
|
2012/C 138/11
|
Case C-116/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Trimeles Protodikeio Serron (Greece) lodged on 5 March 2012 — Ioannis Khristodoulou, Nikolaos Khristodoulou, AFI N. Khristodoulou SA v Greek State
|
7
|
|
2012/C 138/12
|
Case C-132/12 P: Appeal brought on 9 March 2012 by Stichting Woonpunt and Others against the order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 16 December 2011 in Case T-203/10 Stichting Woonpunt and Others v European Commission
|
7
|
|
2012/C 138/13
|
Case C-133/12 P: Appeal brought on 9 March 2012 by Stichting Woonlinie and Others against the order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 16 December 2011 in Case T-202/10 Stichting Woonlinie and Others v European Commission
|
8
|
|
2012/C 138/14
|
Case C-134/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Constanța (Romania) lodged on 12 March 2012 — Corpul Național al Polițiștilor — Biroul Executiv Central (on behalf of and in the interest of its members — public officials with a special status — police serving with the IPJ Tulcea) v Ministerul Administrației și Internelor, Inspectoratul General al Poliției Române, Inspectoratul de Poliție al Județului Tulcea
|
8
|
|
2012/C 138/15
|
Case C-145/12 P: Appeal brought on 26 March 2012 by Neubrandenburger Wohnungsgesellschaft mbH against the order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 9 January 2012 in Case T-407/09 Neubrandenburger Wohnungsgesellschaft mbH v European Commission
|
9
|
|
2012/C 138/16
|
Case C-148/12: Action brought on 26 March 2012 — European Commission v Federal Republic of Germany
|
10
|
|
|
General Court
|
|
|
2012/C 138/17
|
Case T-243/07: Judgment of the General Court of 29 March 2012 — Poland v Commission (Agriculture — Common organisation of the markets — Measures to be adopted as a result of the accession of new Member States — 2003 Act of Accession — Determination of surplus stocks of agricultural products other than sugar, and the financial consequences of their elimination — Objective pursued by a provision of primary law — Decision 2007/361/EC)
|
11
|
|
2012/C 138/18
|
Case T-247/07: Judgment of the General Court of 29 March 2012 — Slovakia v Commission (Agriculture — Common organisation of the markets — Measures to be adopted on account of the accession of new Member States — Act of Accession of 2003 — Determination of surplus stocks of agricultural products other than sugar and financial consequences of their elimination — Objective pursued by a provision of primary law — Decision 2007/361/EC)
|
11
|
|
2012/C 138/19
|
Case T-248/07: Judgment of the General Court of 29 March 2012 — Czech Republic v Commission (Agriculture — Common organisation of the markets — Measures to be adopted due to the accession of new Member States — Act of Accession of 2003 — Determination of surplus stocks of agricultural products other than sugar and the financial consequences of their elimination — Objective pursued by a provision of primary legislation — Decision 2007/361/EC)
|
12
|
|
2012/C 138/20
|
Case T-262/07: Judgment of the General Court of 29 March 2012 — Lithuania v Commission (Agriculture — Common organisation of the markets — Measures to be adopted as a result of the accession of new Member States — 2003 Act of Accession — Determination of surplus stocks of agricultural products other than sugar, and the financial consequences of their elimination — Objective pursued by a provision of primary law — Decision 2007/361/EC)
|
12
|
|
2012/C 138/21
|
Case T-336/07: Judgment of the General Court of 29 March 2012 — Telefónica and Telefónica de España v Commission (Competition — Abuse of a dominant position — Spanish markets for access to broadband internet — Decision declaring an infringement of Article 82 EC — Price-fixing — Margin squeeze — Definition of the markets — Dominant position — Abuse — Calculation of the margin squeeze — Effects of the abuse — Competence of the Commission — Rights of the defence — Subsidiarity — Proportionality — Legal certainty — Sincere cooperation — Principle of sound administration — Fines)
|
13
|
|
2012/C 138/22
|
Case T-398/07: Judgment of the General Court of 29 March 2012 — Spain v Commission (Competition — Abuse of dominant position — Spanish broadband internet access markets — Decision finding an infringement of Article 82 EC — Price-fixing — Margin squeeze — Sincere cooperation — Ultra vires application of Article 82 EC — Legal certainty — Protection of legitimate expectations)
|
13
|
|
2012/C 138/23
|
Case T-214/08: Judgment of the General Court of 28 March 2012 — Rehbein v OHIM — Dias Martinho (OUTBURST) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for registration of the Community figurative mark OUTBURST — Earlier national word mark OUTBURST — Genuine use of the earlier trade mark — Article 43(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — Production of evidence for the first time before the Board of Appeal — Article 74(2) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 76(2) of Regulation No 207/2009) — Rule 22(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95)
|
14
|
|
2012/C 138/24
|
Case T-296/08: Judgment of the General Court of 28 March 2012 — Berliner Institut für Vergleichende Sozialforschung v Commission (Aid granted under the INTI programme — Determination of the amount to be paid to the beneficiary — Errors of assessment)
|
14
|
|
2012/C 138/25
|
Case T-41/09: Judgment of the General Court of 28 March 2012 — Hipp v OHIM — Nestlé (Bebio) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark Bebio — Earlier Community word mark and international word mark BEBA — Partial refusal of registration — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
|
14
|
|
2012/C 138/26
|
Case T-123/09: Judgment of the General Court of 28 March 2012 — Ryanair v European Commission (State aid — Loan granted to an airline company and capable of being counted as own capital — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the common market — Sale of assets of an airline company — Decision finding no aid at the conclusion of the preliminary examination phase — Actions for annulment — Locus standi — Interested party — Admissibility — Serious difficulties — Jurisdiction — Duty to state reasons)
|
15
|
|
2012/C 138/27
|
Case T-417/09: Judgment of the General Court of 29 March 2012 — Poslovni Sistem Mercator v OHIM — Mercator Multihull (MERCATOR STUDIOS) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark MERCATOR STUDIOS — Earlier national and international figurative marks Mercator and Mercator Slovenska košarica — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — No injury to reputation — Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009)
|
15
|
|
2012/C 138/28
|
Case T-111/10: Judgment of the General Court of 29 March 2012 — Portugal v Commission (ERDF — Reduction of financial assistance — Operational Programme seeking modernisation of the economic fabric in Portugal — Absence of precise and verifiable binding objectives — Legitimate expectations)
|
16
|
|
2012/C 138/29
|
Case T-190/10: Judgment of the General Court of 28 March 2012 — Egan and Hackett v Parliament (Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Registers of assistants to former members of the European Parliament — Refusal of access — Exception relating to the protection of privacy and the integrity of the individual — Protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data — Regulation (EC) No 45/2001)
|
16
|
|
2012/C 138/30
|
Case T-369/10: Judgment of the General Court of 29 March 2012 — You-Q BV v OHIM — Apple Corps (BEATLE) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark BEATLE — Earlier national and Community word and figurative marks BEATLES and THE BEATLES — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Reputation — Unfair advantage taken of the distinctive character or reputation of the earlier marks)
|
16
|
|
2012/C 138/31
|
Case T-547/10: Judgment of the General Court of 29 March 2012 — Omya v OHIM — Alpha Calcit (CALCIMATT) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark CALCIMATT — Prior Community word mark CALCILAN — Relative grounds for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Refusal of registration)
|
17
|
|
2012/C 138/32
|
Case T-242/11: Judgment of the General Court of 29 March 2012 — Kaltenbach & Voigt v OHIM (3D eXam) (Community trade mark — International registration — Request for territorial extension of protection — Figurative mark 3D eXam — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptive character and lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
|
17
|
|
2012/C 138/33
|
Case T-453/10: Order of the General Court of 6 March 2012 — Northern Ireland Department of Agriculture and Rural Development v Commission (Action for annulment — EAGGF, EAGF and EAFRD — Expenditure incurred by the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland — Expenditure excluded from European Union financing — Devolved administration — No direct concern — Inadmissibility)
|
17
|
|
2012/C 138/34
|
Case T-106/12: Action brought on 29 February 2012 — Cytochroma Development v OHIM — Teva Pharmaceutical Industries (ALPHAREN)
|
18
|
|
2012/C 138/35
|
Case T-117/12: Action brought on 14 March 2012 — ANKO v Commission
|
18
|
|
2012/C 138/36
|
Case T-118/12: Action brought on 14 March 2012 — ANKO v Commission
|
19
|
|
2012/C 138/37
|
Case T-125/12: Action brought on 14 March 2012 — Viasat Broadcasting UK v Commission
|
19
|
|
|
European Union Civil Service Tribunal
|
|
|
2012/C 138/38
|
Case F-56/05: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 29 September 2011 — Strobl v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Appointment — Candidates placed on a reserve list prior to the entry into force of the new Staff Regulations — Grading under the new, less favourable rules — Article 12 of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations — Protection of legitimate expectations — Principle of equality — Age discrimination)
|
21
|
|
2012/C 138/39
|
Case F-70/05: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 29 September 2011 — Mische v Commission (Civil service — Appointment — Successful candidate in a competition published before the entry into force of the new Staff Regulations but finalised afterwards — Grading under new, less favourable rules)
|
21
|
|
2012/C 138/40
|
Case F-93/05: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 29 September 2011 — Mische v Parliament (Civil service — Appointment — Recruitment and simultaneous transfer to another institution — Grading under new, less favourable rules — Admissibility of the action — Interest in bringing an action — Action out of time)
|
22
|
|
2012/C 138/41
|
Case F-18/09: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 10 November 2011 — Mohamed Merhzaoui v Council of the European Union (Civil service — Officials — Promotion — Classification in grade — Local staff appointed as officials — Article 10 of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations — Article 3 of the annex to the CEOS — Promotion exercise for 2008 — Consideration of comparative merits of officials attached to the career stream AST — Procedure based on staff reports 2005/2006 — Criterion of the level of responsibilities exercised)
|
22
|
|
2012/C 138/42
|
Case F-20/09: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 10 November 2011 — Juvyns v Council (Civil service — Officials — Promotion — 2008 promotion procedure — Comparative examination of merit — Procedure based on 2005/2006 annual staff reports — Criterion of the level of responsibilities exercised)
|
22
|
|
2012/C 138/43
|
Case F-19/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 28 March 2012 — Marsili v Commission (Civil service — Open competition — Non-inclusion on the reserve list — Evaluation of the oral test — Composition of the selection board)
|
23
|
|
2012/C 138/44
|
Case F-27/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 10 March 2011 — Begue and Others v Commission (Civil service — Members of the contract staff — Staff entitled to an allowance for regular stand-by duty — Article 55 and Article 56b of the Staff Regulations — Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 495/77)
|
23
|
|
2012/C 138/45
|
Case F-28/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 15 March 2011 — VE (*1) v Commission (Staff cases — Contractual agents — Remuneration — Expatriation allowance — Conditions laid down in Article 4 of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations — Habitual residence prior to taking up duties)
|
23
|
|
2012/C 138/46
|
Case F-72/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 29 September 2011 — da Silva Tenreiro v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Recruitment — Article 7(1) of the Staff Regulations — Article 29(1)(a) and (b) of the Staff Regulations — Manifest error of assessment — Misuse of powers — Statement of reasons)
|
24
|
|
2012/C 138/47
|
Case F-74/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 29 September 2011 — Kimman v Commission (Staff cases — Civil servants — Article 43 of the Staff Regulations — Article 45 of the Staff Regulations — 2009 appraisal — Classification in a level of performance — Decision awarding promotion points — Appraisal report — Opinion of the ad hoc group — Infringement of the duty to give reasons — Plea raised of its own motion — Burden of proof)
|
24
|
|
2012/C 138/48
|
Case F-80/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 29 September 2011 — AJ v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Promotion — Articles 43 and 45 of the Staff Regulations — Appraisal report — Manifest error of assessment — Statement of reasons)
|
24
|
|
2012/C 138/49
|
Case F-81/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 14 July 2011 — Praskevicius v Parliament (Civil service — Officials — Promotion — Article 45 of the Staff Regulations — Manifest error of assessment — Merit points — Consideration of comparative merits — Statement of reasons)
|
25
|
|
2012/C 138/50
|
Case F-89/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 8 September 2011 — Bovagnet v Commission (Civil Service — Officials — Remuneration — Family allowances — Education allowance — Education costs — Definition)
|
25
|
|
2012/C 138/51
|
Case F-100/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 29 February 2012 — AM v Parliament (Civil service — Officials — Social security — Insurance against accidents and occupational disease — Article 73 of the Staff Regulations — Refusal to recognise the accidental cause of a stroke — Medical committee — Principle of collegiality)
|
25
|
|
2012/C 138/52
|
Case F-113/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 15 February 2012 — AT v EACEA (Civil service — Member of the temporary staff — Evaluation report — Definitive nature — Time-limit for bringing an action — Out of time — Early termination of fixed-term employment contract on ground of incompetence — Review by the courts — Manifest error of assessment)
|
26
|
|
2012/C 138/53
|
Case F-114/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 29 September 2011 — Bowles, Larue and Whitehead v ECB (Staff case — Staff of the ECB — General adjustment to salaries — Method of calculation — Provisional data — Economic and financial crisis — Special circumstances — Act adversely affecting an official — Pay slip — Provisional act)
|
26
|
|
2012/C 138/54
|
Case F-119/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 29 November 2011 — Di Tullio v Commission (Civil service — Temporary staff — Leave for national service — Article 18 of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants — Professional soldier — Completion of a period of territorial command — Refusal)
|
26
|
|
2012/C 138/55
|
Case F-121/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 29 September 2011 — Michael Heath v ECB (Civil Service — ECB Staff — Pension scheme — Pension plan — Annual pension increase — Harmonised index of consumer prices — Opinion of pension plan actuary — Consultation of staff committee — Consultation of oversight committee — Right to negotiate by collective agreement)
|
27
|
|
2012/C 138/56
|
Case F-123/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 1 February 2012 — Bancale and Buccheri v Commission (Civil Service — Temporary staff — Internal competitions — Conditions for admission — Professional experience acquired after obtaining the diploma — Diploma — Qualifications obtained before obtaining the diploma — Equivalence)
|
27
|
|
2012/C 138/57
|
Case F-36/11: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 28 March 2012 — BD v Commission (Civil service — Contract staff — Non-extension of employment contract — Article 11a of the Staff Regulations — Conflict of interest — Relationship of trust — Article 12b of the Staff Regulations — Outside activity — Presumption of innocence)
|
27
|
|
2012/C 138/58
|
Case F-71/09: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 12 May 2011 — Caminiti v Commission (Staff case — Officials — Action manifestly unfounded — Entry into force of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 723/2004 — Articles 44 and 46 of the Staff Regulations — Article 7 of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations — Classification — Multiplication factor — Promotion points)
|
28
|
|
2012/C 138/59
|
Case F-21/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 16 March 2011 — Marcuccio v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Action for damages — Illegality — Letter concerning the costs of a case sent to the lawyer who represented the applicant in the case — Action manifestly devoid of any basis in law — Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure)
|
28
|
|
2012/C 138/60
|
Case F-32/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 13 April 2011 — Wilk v Commission (Civil Service — Members of the temporary staff — Reimbursement of expenses — Installation allowance — Installation with family at the place of employment — Recovery of undue payments — Action manifestly inadmissible or manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
|
28
|
|
2012/C 138/61
|
Case F-46/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 22 June 2011 — AD v Commission (No need to adjudicate)
|
29
|
|
2012/C 138/62
|
Case F-57/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 7 July 2011 — Pedeferri and Others v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Action — Persons claiming the status of official or servant of the European Union — Inadmissibility — Failure to observe the pre-litigation procedure)
|
29
|
|
2012/C 138/63
|
Case F-59/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 10 May 2011 — Barthel, Reiffers and Massez v Court of Justice (Civil Service — Preliminary issues — Plea of inadmissibility — Complaint out of time — Inadmissibility)
|
29
|
|
2012/C 138/64
|
Case F-67/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 21 June 2011 — Marcuccio v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Action for damages relating to the taxation of costs — Inadmissibility)
|
30
|
|
2012/C 138/65
|
Case F-69/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 8 September 2011 — Marcuccio v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Action for damages — Illegality — Letter concerning the costs of a case sent to the lawyer who represented the applicant in that case — Action manifestly devoid of any basis in law — Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure)
|
30
|
|
2012/C 138/66
|
Case F-107/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 17 March 2011 — AP v Court of Justice (Civil service — Delay — Manifest inadmissibility)
|
30
|
|
2012/C 138/67
|
Case F-108/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 25 July 2011 — Filice and others v Court of Justice (Civil service — Annual adjustment of the remuneration and pensions of officials and other EU staff — No need to adjudicate)
|
30
|
|
2012/C 138/68
|
Case F-18/11: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 7 July 2011 — Zaffino v Commission (Civil service — Persons claiming the status of official or servant of the European Union — Action — Manifestly inadmissible — Failure to comply with the preliminary procedure)
|
31
|
|
2012/C 138/69
|
Case F-19/11: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 7 July 2011 — Galvan v Commission (Civil Service — Person claiming the status of official or servant of the European Union — Action — Manifest inadmissibility — Failure to observe the pre-litigation procedure)
|
31
|
|
2012/C 138/70
|
Case F-20/11: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 7 July 2011 — Bracalente v Commission (Civil service — Persons claiming the status of official or servant of the European Union — Action — Manifestly inadmissible — Failure to comply with preliminary procedure)
|
31
|
|
2012/C 138/71
|
Case F-21/11: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 7 July 2011 — Pirri v Commission (Civil Service — Person claiming the status of official or other servant of the European Union — Action — Manifest inadmissibility — failure to observe the pre-contentious procedure)
|
31
|
|
2012/C 138/72
|
Case F-85/11: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 6 December 2011 — Wendelboe v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Preliminary issues — Objection of inadmissibility — Refusal to promote an official — Transfer between institutions during the promotion year in which the official would have been promoted in his institution of origin — Complaint — Delay — Inadmissibility)
|
32
|
|
2012/C 138/73
|
Case F-12/12: Action brought on 27 January 2012 — ZZ v Commission
|
32
|
|
2012/C 138/74
|
Case F-13/12: Action brought on 3 February 2012 — ZZ v Commission
|
32
|
|
2012/C 138/75
|
Case F-14/12: Action brought on 4 February 2012 — ZZ v European Court of Auditors
|
33
|
|
2012/C 138/76
|
Case F-16/12: Action brought on 10 February 2012 — ZZ v Commission
|
33
|
|
2012/C 138/77
|
Case F-17/12: Action brought on 8 February 2012 — ZZ v Commission
|
33
|
|
2012/C 138/78
|
Case F-18/12: Action brought on 9 February 2012 — ZZ and ZZ v Commission
|
34
|
|
2012/C 138/79
|
Case F-19/12: Action brought on 13 February 2012 — ZZ v Commission
|
34
|
|
2012/C 138/80
|
Case F-20/12: Action brought on 15 February 2012 — ZZ v EIGE
|
35
|
|
2012/C 138/81
|
Case F-22/12: Action brought on 17th February 2012 — ZZ v Commission and CEPOL
|
35
|
|
2012/C 138/82
|
Case F-23/12: Action brought on 20 February 2012 — ZZ and Others v Commission
|
35
|
|
2012/C 138/83
|
Case F-24/12: Action brought on 27 February 2012 — ZZ v Parliament
|
36
|
|
2012/C 138/84
|
Case F-25/12: Action brought on 21 February 2012 — ZZ v Commission
|
36
|
|
2012/C 138/85
|
Case F-30/12: Action brought on 5 March 2012 — ZZ v Commission
|
36
|
|
2012/C 138/86
|
Case F-32/12: Action brought on 7 March 2012 — ZZ v Commission
|
36
|
|
2012/C 138/87
|
Case F-35/12: Action brought on 14 March 2012 — ZZ v BEREC
|
37
|
|
2012/C 138/88
|
Case F-38/12: Action brought on 19th March 2012 — ZZ v FRA
|
37
|
|
2012/C 138/89
|
Case F-39/12: Action brought on 19 March 2012 — ZZ v Court of Auditors
|
38
|
|
2012/C 138/90
|
Case F-41/12: Action brought on 21 March 2012 — ZZ v Parliament
|
38
|
|
2012/C 138/91
|
Case F-138/07: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 16 September 2011 — Van Arum v Parliament
|
39
|
|
2012/C 138/92
|
Case F-76/08: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 4 April 2011 — Behmer v Parliament
|
39
|
|
2012/C 138/93
|
Case F-24/09: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 13 February 2012 — Wagner-Leclercq v Council
|
39
|
|
2012/C 138/94
|
Case F-18/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 15 February 2011 — Capidis v Commission
|
39
|
|
2012/C 138/95
|
Case F-24/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 11 March 2011 — Kaskarelis v Commission
|
39
|
|
2012/C 138/96
|
Case F-37/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 12 May 2011 — Stratakis v Commission
|
39
|
|
2012/C 138/97
|
Case F-95/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 10 February 2012 — Bömcke v EIB
|
39
|
|
2012/C 138/98
|
Case F-103/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 25 July 2011 — Jaeger v Eurofound
|
39
|
|
2012/C 138/99
|
Case F-105/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 10 February 2012 — Bömcke v EIB
|
40
|
|
2012/C 138/100
|
Case F-127/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 10 February 2012 — Bömcke v EIB
|
40
|
|
2012/C 138/101
|
Case F-5/11: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 19 September 2011 — Mariën v Commission
|
40
|
|
2012/C 138/102
|
Case F-15/11: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 19 September 2011 — Mariën v SEAE
|
40
|
|
2012/C 138/103
|
Case F-26/11: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 18 November 2011 — AC v Council
|
40
|
|
2012/C 138/104
|
Case F-30/11: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 21 October 2011 — Torijano Montero v Council
|
40
|
|
2012/C 138/105
|
Case F-35/11: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 7 December 2011 — Svitana v Parliament
|
40
|
|
2012/C 138/106
|
Case F-68/11: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 12 January 2012 — Schreiber v Commission
|
40
|
